Terence Corcoran: Capitalism’s comeback


I thought this was a great arlicle worth sharing!!

Bruce

Total Credits to the Financial Post

It’s up to free markets and the private sector to bail us out of the mess

The spirit of capitalism, supposedly killed off in the wake of the financial crisis, is sweeping the world’s economies. From Obama’s new White House to the Las Vegas computer show to the international auto industry and beyond, business is making a comeback and the essence of free markets — competition — is ripping through the global economic system.

Never mind the jobless rates. They are lagging indicators. Jobs don’t create investment. Investment creates jobs, and there is every sign that competitive enterprises are turning around despite the vast overhang of big government, deficits and inflation risks.

One obvious epicentre of capitalist competition is the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas. If electronics executives were bankers they’d be regulated out of existence as greedy soul-less corporate plunderers intent on filling their own pockets and driving their competitors out of business. That’s what electronics executives do for a living. But since iPads and tablets are tangible objects of progress, profits and fun, rather than seemingly useless abstractions such as derivatives and default swaps, the electronics show is viewed as a glorious demonstration of the benefits of dog-eat-dog competition.

Companies from all over the world have one objective — to overthrow Apple’s iPad dominace. One estimate put the number of competitive tablets coming on the market at 80. Other dominant firms, such as Canada’s Research In Motion, must bring in new improved BlackBerry products to meet the onslaught of wireless products. These products are themselves killing off a young industry — PCs and laptop computers.

A famous economist once said that capitalism is creative destruction. It’s not. It’s simply creative.

The global auto industry is just as explosive.

On Friday Chrysler introduced revamped models of the Chrysler 300, Dodge Charger and Dodge Challenger into a market that is about to be flooded with new models. New large-car models, sports cars and compacts from Hyundai, Toyota, GM, BMW, Honda, Ford, Mercedes and others — with powerful engines, lighter weight and snazzier new interiors and designs — are about to swamp consumers with competitive choice. Today, no one company holds more than 17% of the North American auto market, and seven firms have shares of 5% or more — indicators of increasingly intense competition.

Electronics and cars are just the high-profile manifestations of the new capitalism and the ideological shift that has taken place over the past year or so. We are on a wave of change that will continue to dominate throughout this New Year.

What we witnessed last year and will experience through much of this year was the crash and burn of the great liberal fantasy that grew out of the global financial crisis. The financial crisis, it was said, marked the End of Capitalism. Across Europe and throughout the United States, and into the darkest corners of the Canadian political landscape, we saw politicians and pundits declare the market economy to be a thing of the past.

Nothing symbolizes the failure of the new statist ideology than the rebirth of Barack Obama as a middle-of-the-road politician. The great leftist has transformed himself into the great centrist. In the wake of the mid-term election collapse of the Democrats, the Obama administration is now supporting tax cuts, backing away from radical reforms, pushing free trade.

On Thursday, Mr. Obama appointed Bill Daley, a Chicago moderate Democrat with JPMorgan/Wall Street credentials as White House chief of staff. A meeting with Thomas Donohue, head of the anti-Obama U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is scheduled for next month, marking a major shift in the Obama administration’s approach to business.

In Canada, there are plenty of signs that ever-expanding interventionist governments are not all that welcome by voters.

British Columbia lost a Liberal premier after a tax revolt. Ontario is heading into an election that seems likely to administer some punishment to a Liberal government that has created a fiscal mess, soaring electricity rates and a ubiquitous nanny-state. In Alberta, the Wild Rose Party is nipping at the flabby Ed Stelmach Conservatives. In Ottawa, the left never caught the financial crisis wave that swept Europe and the United States.

In short, we are witnessing the end of The End of Capitalism as the world waits to see whether free markets and the private sector can bail us out of the mess left behind by massive expansion of government spending and monetary extravagance.

The markets are ready to take up the challenge. Corporations and investors are sitting on unprecedented volumes of cash. This is the capital that will drive capitalism’s recapture of the economy and a return to growth. That’s already happening, as Richard Salsman of InterMarket Forecasting noted recently.

 That these trends toward more growth and production will continue through the year seems all but inevitable. What is not certain is the ability of governments to get out of the way fast enough to make growth solid and sustainable. Getting out of the way means two things: reducing government spending and reining in monetary policy.

All governments now talk about reducing deficits. But if Washington, Ottawa and the provinces are to avoid fiscal calamities — and even Eurostyle debt meltdowns — they must begin by reducing spending. So far, politicians are talking about the need for fiscal reform but nobody is doing anything.

The second big uncertainty is monetary policy. Unprecedented printing of money by the Federal Reserve has flooded the world economy with U.S. dollars. As a result, the U.S. dollar is going down and commodity prices are rising, including oil.

Low interest rates and monetary expansion are creating an environment that could fuel pockets of inflation—bubbles—that risk a repeat of the mortgage bubble that was at the heart of the financial crisis.

But there’s no denying a major shift in the political and economic landscape — a shift back to markets, growth and competition. Capitalism is on the rise, but the state has yet to get as far out of the way as it should.

Read more: http://opinion.financialpost.com/2011/01/07/terence-corocoran-capitalisms-comeback/#ixzz1ATxLak6a

25 thoughts on “Terence Corcoran: Capitalism’s comeback

  1. thesonofturner says:

    One comment off the top…

    The “Liberal” government in BC is NOT the group that author thinks it is. The BC Liberals are predominantly the same group who were driving when the BC Social Credit Party shot itself down in flames several years ago. These clowns (and YES, they ARE clowns!) make Harper and the federal Conservatives look like Maoists by comparison…

  2. thesonofturner says:

    And on a more irritated note…

    As I reread the article, about 2/3 through I come across

    “In short, we are witnessing the end of The End of Capitalism as the world waits to see whether free markets and the private sector can bail us out of the mess left behind by massive expansion of government spending and monetary extravagance.

    The markets are ready to take up the challenge. Corporations and investors are sitting on unprecedented volumes of cash. This is the capital that will drive capitalism’s recapture of the economy and a return to growth. ”

    Is it just me, or does this imply that corporations and investors are currently choosing not to invest, make money, or contribute towards solving a damned thing until they are BRIBED into doing so, through further tax breaks and incentives which, in the short term at the very least, will come at the expense of the rest of the taxpayers, many of whom are still dealing with trying to deal with the fallout from the financial meltdown?

    • thesonofturner says:

      And yes, the doubling up of dealing with is deliberate. If these fellas currently have all this capital sitting there, they are the ONLY fellas who DO, and they choose to sit on this capital until those still reeling (from a crisis they personally had SCREWED ALL control over) tighten their belts just a bit more, so that we can start trickling down a bit more?

      • Sorry I had to change some words!
        The reality is in my opinion is that of course the Capitalists are going to take advantage of the situation. If the Government continues to reward them for doing it then they are going to continue to starve them. The more grants and tax incentives they get the more they will squeeze.
        If governments change their approach then so will the capitalists. A think wallet has no remorse.
        Remeber Comapnies are controlled by shareholders! Without shareholers support there is no capital.Shareholders are the me and you of this world.

        Bruce

    • The financial melt down was in fact caused by Government intervention into the market place. The Governments failed to do their job in the first place. Subsequently the specualtors raped and pilaged using the rules laid out by the regulators.
      Yes we can say shame shame but it was in fact the job of those paid by us to prevent the type of thievery that happened.
      Every single Taxpayer allowed this to happen while they made money trying to capitalize on the weakness of the system in place and when it blew up they blamed the very people that indeed built it in the first place. Fair play how ever they have the money now! You want their capital then you must adhere to their terms or they will not play.
      With the rules and regulations in place you are better to take your money where you make the most with less rules.
      In the last five years the regulations in Ontario went from 250,000 to 550,000. where as in BC the rules actually reduced. Not surpriseing that Ontario is now a have not Province.
      Go ahead and bitch about the Capitalists, but understand if you bite the hand that feeds you the hand will go away!

      BAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
      Bruce

  3. thesonofturner says:

    Bruce, I could understand the editing out of the copulation vernacular if this was a family blog where we were expecting comments from Little Mary-Sue or Johnny, but my posts were deliberately angry and ranting. Way to go in deflating the entire tone of a good rant. If you can’t handle a bit of vitriol, perhaps an anti-establishment political blog is a bit beyond your ability…

    When I made the comment, I was exceptionally PISSED OFF, not mildly irritated…

    • thesonofturner says:

      And no, I am NOT a shareholder. If I decide I want more money, I’ll go out and earn it, not throw what I have at some other individual and expect the money to do the work for me. Sitting on one’s ass expecting a shrewd investment to earn a living is a good part of where the problems developed in the first place.

      • thesonofturner says:

        In response to your reference to regulations in BC vrs Ontario, its not nearly “wonderful” out here regulation-wise. Between the back-door dealings involved in the sale of BC Rail, the privatization of BC Ferries (which is a part of the NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM!!!) , the bald-faced LIES surrounding the HST implementation, and the more than $6 MILLION plea bargain in the Basi/Virk case, any benefits from fewer regulation are more than overshadowed by corruption, greed, and graft…

      • I agree with you totally!
        When we surrender our leadership to the whims of the few that govern through regulation, we risk exploitation.
        The fact is the regulators that govern are suseptible to corruption only if we allow it. At the moment we are lacking dramaticly clear leadership.
        They govern with fear. Do as I say not as I do!
        We allow it.
        The result of actions past allow for abuse and reduction in the very foundation of a free country!

        Bruce

      • We all make choices!
        To start and buld a business in this country is doomed because of the lack of available capital.
        Banks don’t lend without 200% security and anyone wanting to start a business are has to put their whole life on the lne.
        Rember it was creative minds that built this country with small businesses. This has been killed by regualtions that restrict the ability of the small business to grow.
        Small farms are almost non existence to day as a result of regualtions hindering the availablty of capital. Small retail is being pushed out of business because of the cost associated with the enforcement of regulations that increase the cost of operation beyond their ability to survive.
        I respect your position however when the only place you can buy product is Walmart because there is no competition left perhaps you will understand.
        Without acces to capital there is no development or growth. Over regulation and taxation assures the promise of growth in government and the reduction of personal freedom.
        The problems we face are the direct result of government involvement in the controll of the masses to asure the success of the lager corporate sector.

        Bruce

    • And so you should!
      The flavor of your rant is not taken away by the editing! I think your points were made and your anger appreciated!
      However I chose to amend the tone down somewhat because your offer signifigant insight who’s point is somewhat diminished with the adjectives used.
      I believe that we as intelligent beings need not abuse the more sensitive in our anger with terms that some may find offensive and not get the point becase of the authors choice of words.
      I would rather have them read what you are thinking and share the point than to loose them because of words.
      It waq\s a great rant, I enjoyed it! You make outstanding points that give rise to futher thought.
      The situation as a whole requires input from all sectors if we wish to find a true solution. Lets not scare away potential input because they are not open minded enough to accept a few cuss words as acceptable.

      Ya catch more flies with honey!

      Bruce
      By the way Happy New Year my friend!!

      Bruce

  4. thesonofturner says:

    Bruce, I often DO think in the vernacular, and believe me, your overzealous editing for “bad words” (I follow the Carlin school. There are no bad words, only bad context) DID change the tone of my post considerably. You took it from a decent rant to the level of a mild bitch, and my personal feeling is that if you let offense at a few (carefully chosen, BTW) words that you fear may offend someone on a political blog cloud your understanding of the issue at hand, then you’re not committed to the discussion as a whole.

    Yes, editing SHOULD be used in situations where laws are being broken, or where an individual is being targetted or threatened, but methinks you are overdoing it a bit.

    Besides, I don’t aim to catch flies…I’d rather catch a stacked young redhead, thank you very much…

    Happy New Year and welcome back yourself, BTW.

  5. thesonofturner says:

    So, the discussion of whether the word “fuck” is to be stifled has quietly gone away?

    [/post]

  6. thesonofturner says:

    So, does that mean I’ll be making a reasonable (but not complete) attempt at keeping it minimized? Or that dummy-ing it down for the thin-skinned is the order of the day?

    • Every thing in moderation and reasonable taste is acceptable.
      I say fuck a lot more than I should I guess but I try to tone it down when writing out of respect for those reading.

      Bruce

      • thesonofturner says:

        Can I quote you on that later, Bruce?

        As I’m sure you have noticed, its not that I use such language as a matter of common course, but I dislike having a strongly-felt post watered down simply because someone can’t handle it in the context of a rant…

      • Sure Fill your boots!
        Bruce

  7. thesonofturner says:

    Any chance you could de-edit my original post to reflect that, please? 8)

  8. thesonofturner says:

    Since it becomes obvious that regardless of your platitudes you have no intention of accurately rendering comments from others accurately, in spite of gentle reminders that while it is YOUR blog, it is the comments from those who read it that make it more than just a digital diary, I’ll be going back to following things second hand via whatever Dad CC’s me in his emails and the Explore the Bruce Facebook page.

    Congratulations, bikeatthebeach, you appear to have “won”.

Leave a comment